Content.Shared/Prying/Systems/PryingSystem.cs (2)

Line range hint 131-134: Prevent potential division by zero in time calculation

The calculation of time divides by toolModifier, which could potentially be zero if not properly validated. This could lead to a division by zero exception at runtime. Ensure that toolModifier is checked to be non-zero before performing the division.

Apply this diff to add a validation check:

 var time = modEv.BaseTime * modEv.PryTimeModifier / toolModifier;

+if (toolModifier == 0)
+{
+    throw new InvalidOperationException("Tool modifier cannot be zero.");
+}

 if (time <= modEv.Neglect)
     time = 0;

---

Line range hint 179-179: Clarify condition logic to ensure correct evaluation

The condition door.State is not DoorState.Closing and not DoorState.Opening may not evaluate as intended due to operator precedence. Without parentheses, the logic could be misinterpreted, leading to unintended behavior. Consider adding parentheses or refactoring the condition for clarity.

Apply this diff to clarify the condition:

-if (args.Used != null && comp != null && door.State is not DoorState.Closing and not DoorState.Opening)
+if (args.Used != null && comp != null && door.State is not (DoorState.Closing or DoorState.Opening))

Alternatively, refactor the condition:

-if (args.Used != null && comp != null && door.State is not DoorState.Closing and not DoorState.Opening)
+if (args.Used != null && comp != null && door.State != DoorState.Closing && door.State != DoorState.Opening)

Content.Server/Fluids/EntitySystems/AbsorbentSystem.cs (3)

313-317: Re-evaluate the use of break in the puddle interaction loop

When available == FixedPoint2.Zero, the code pops up a message and then uses break to exit the foreach loop. This means that if the absorber lacks the necessary solution, it will not attempt to interact with any remaining puddles in the targets collection. Confirm that this early exit is intentional and won't prevent interactions with other puddles that might still be valid.

Consider handling this condition per puddle without exiting the loop prematurely, allowing the absorber to interact with other puddles if possible.

---

344-347: Add comments to clarify position transformations for the lunge action

The calculations for localPos involve complex transformations, including inverses and rotations. Adding explanatory comments can improve code readability and help future maintainers understand the purpose and necessity of these calculations.

---

285-289: Improve error handling for grid and tile retrieval

When attempting to find the grid and tile at the specified coordinates, there's a possibility that the grid might not exist, or the coordinates could be invalid. Currently, the code returns false if _mapManager.TryFindGridAt fails. Consider logging an error or providing feedback to the user to aid in debugging potential issues with coordinate validity.

Content.Server/Animals/Systems/WoolySystem.cs (2)

12-14: Consider enhancing the documentation.

While the current documentation is accurate, it could be more comprehensive by:

• Explaining the hunger mechanics and its impact on production
• Documenting the HungerComponent interaction
• Adding parameter ranges for production rates

 /// <summary>
-///     Gives ability to produce fiber reagents, produces endless if the
-///     owner has no HungerComponent
+///     Handles the production of fiber reagents by wooly entities.
+///     Production is governed by hunger levels when a HungerComponent is present,
+///     requiring an "Okay" hunger threshold. Without HungerComponent, production is unlimited.
+///     Production occurs at regular intervals defined by GrowthDelay.
 /// </summary>

---

Line range hint 31-53: Consider adding safety measures and logging.

The wool production logic could benefit from additional safeguards:

1. Consider implementing a production limit even without HungerComponent
2. Add solution container capacity checks
3. Include error logging for failed operations

 while (query.MoveNext(out var uid, out var wooly))
 {
     if (now < wooly.NextGrowth)
         continue;

     wooly.NextGrowth = now + wooly.GrowthDelay;

     if (_mobState.IsDead(uid))
         continue;

+    // Track production count even without hunger
+    if (!EntityManager.TryGetComponent(uid, out HungerComponent? hunger))
+    {
+        var maxProductionPerDay = 100; // Configure as needed
+        if (wooly.DailyProduction >= maxProductionPerDay)
+            continue;
+        wooly.DailyProduction++;
+    }
+
     // Actually there is food digestion so no problem with instant reagent generation "OnFeed"
-    if (EntityManager.TryGetComponent(uid, out HungerComponent? hunger))
+    else
     {
         // Is there enough nutrition to produce reagent?
         if (_hunger.GetHungerThreshold(hunger) < HungerThreshold.Okay)
             continue;

         _hunger.ModifyHunger(uid, -wooly.HungerUsage, hunger);
     }

     if (!_solutionContainer.ResolveSolution(uid, wooly.SolutionName, ref wooly.Solution))
+    {
+        Logger.Warning($"Failed to resolve solution {wooly.SolutionName} for wooly entity {uid}");
         continue;
+    }

+    if (!_solutionContainer.CanAddReagent(wooly.Solution.Value, wooly.ReagentId, wooly.Quantity))
+    {
+        Logger.Debug($"Solution container full for wooly entity {uid}");
+        continue;
+    }

     _solutionContainer.TryAddReagent(wooly.Solution.Value, wooly.ReagentId, wooly.Quantity, out _);
 }

Content.Server/FootPrint/PuddleFootPrintsSystem.cs (4)

Line range hint 33-34: Add null check and consider using a constant for "Water"

The water quantity calculation could be improved:

1. Consider using a constant instead of the hardcoded "Water" string
2. The LINQ query could be simplified

-var waterQuantity = (from sol in solutions.Contents where sol.Reagent.Prototype == "Water" select (float) sol.Quantity).FirstOrDefault();
+private const string WaterPrototype = "Water";
+var waterQuantity = solutions.Contents
+    .Where(sol => sol.Reagent.Prototype == WaterPrototype)
+    .Select(sol => (float)sol.Quantity)
+    .FirstOrDefault();

---

Line range hint 36-36: Prevent potential division by zero

The calculation totalSolutionQuantity / 100f could throw if totalSolutionQuantity is 0.

-if (waterQuantity / (totalSolutionQuantity / 100f) > component.OffPercent || solutions.Contents.Count <= 0)
+if (totalSolutionQuantity == 0 || solutions.Contents.Count <= 0 || waterQuantity / (totalSolutionQuantity / 100f) > component.OffPercent)

---

Line range hint 39-40: Simplify highest quantity reagent selection

The LINQ aggregate operation could be simplified using MaxBy.

-tripper.ReagentToTransfer =
-    solutions.Contents.Aggregate((l, r) => l.Quantity > r.Quantity ? l : r).Reagent.Prototype;
+tripper.ReagentToTransfer = solutions.Contents
+    .MaxBy(x => x.Quantity)?.Reagent.Prototype;

---

Line range hint 14-48: Consider splitting solution management logic

The PuddleFootPrintsSystem handles both footprint mechanics and solution management. Consider extracting the solution-related logic into a separate service to improve separation of concerns and maintainability.

Content.Server/Doors/Systems/AirlockSystem.cs (2)

24-24: LGTM: Event handling order change improves system interaction.

The modification ensures that DoorSystem handles activation events before AirlockSystem, which is the correct hierarchical order since airlocks are a specialized type of door.

This change follows the principle of processing events from base to specialized systems, which helps prevent conflicts in door functionality.

---

70-74: LGTM: Added proper event handling check.

The early return when the event is already handled is a good defensive programming practice that complements the event order change.

Consider adding a debug log when skipping already handled events to help with troubleshooting:

  if (args.Handled)
+     Logger.Debug($"Skipping airlock activation for {ToPrettyString(uid)} - event already handled");
      return;

Content.Server/FootPrint/FootPrintsSystem.cs (2)

26-26: Remove non-standard comment marker

While the dependency injection is good, let's remove the "WD EDIT" comment as it doesn't follow standard documentation practices.

-    [Dependency] private readonly StandingStateSystem _standingState = default!; // WD EDIT
+    [Dependency] private readonly StandingStateSystem _standingState = default!;

---

Line range hint 1-124: Architecture aligns well with PR objectives

The changes to FootPrintsSystem effectively support the PR objective of making footprints appear as full puddles while improving the state management architecture. The system properly handles:

• Different character states (standing/down) through StandingStateSystem
• Fluid interactions through solution containers
• Various footprint appearances based on equipment and state

Consider adding unit tests to verify the interaction between StandingStateSystem and footprint generation, especially for edge cases in state transitions.

Content.Client/Weather/WeatherSystem.cs (2)

120-120: LGTM with a minor typo fix.

The optimization to reuse the already validated AudioComponent is good. However, there's a typo in the comment ("EDIR" should be "EDIT").

-        _audio.SetGain(weather.Stream, alpha, comp); // WD EDIR
+        _audio.SetGain(weather.Stream, alpha, comp); // WD EDIT

---

Line range hint 1-165: Consider enhancing audio resource cleanup.

While the changes improve audio handling, consider implementing IDisposable or adding explicit cleanup in OnRemove to ensure audio resources are properly disposed when the weather system is shut down.

Example implementation:

-public sealed class WeatherSystem : SharedWeatherSystem
+public sealed class WeatherSystem : SharedWeatherSystem, IDisposable
 {
     // ... existing code ...
+
+    public void Dispose()
+    {
+        foreach (var (_, weather) in GetWeathers())
+        {
+            weather.Stream = _audio.Stop(weather.Stream);
+        }
+    }
 }

Content.Shared/Medical/CPR/Systems/CPRSystem.cs (3)

32-32: Consider removing or standardizing edit markers

The "WD EDIT" comment might not follow project conventions. Consider either removing it or using a more standard format for tracking changes.

-        [Dependency] private readonly IGameTiming _timing = default!; // WD EDIT
+        [Dependency] private readonly IGameTiming _timing = default!;

---

63-66: LGTM: Prediction check properly implemented

The prediction check is correctly placed to prevent duplicate processing. However, consider removing the "WD EDIT" markers for consistency.

-            // WD EDIT START
-            if (!_timing.IsFirstTimePredicted)
-                return;
-            // WD EDIT END
+            if (!_timing.IsFirstTimePredicted)
+                return;

---

70-93: LGTM: Popup and mask checks improved, with potential for refactoring

The changes correctly implement predicted popups and mask blocking checks. However, there's an opportunity to reduce code duplication in the mask checking logic.

Consider extracting the mask check logic into a helper method:

+        private bool IsMaskBlocking(EntityUid? maskEntity)
+        {
+            return maskEntity != null && 
+                   TryComp<IngestionBlockerComponent>(maskEntity, out var blocker) && 
+                   blocker.Enabled;
+        }

         private void StartCPR(EntityUid performer, EntityUid target, CPRTrainingComponent cprComponent)
         {
             // ... existing code ...

-            if (_inventory.TryGetSlotEntity(target, "mask", out var mask)
-                && TryComp<IngestionBlockerComponent>(mask, out var blockerTarget)
-                && blockerTarget.Enabled)
+            if (_inventory.TryGetSlotEntity(target, "mask", out var mask) && IsMaskBlocking(mask))
             {
                 _popupSystem.PopupPredicted(Loc.GetString("cpr-must-remove", ("clothing", mask)), performer, performer, PopupType.MediumCaution);
                 return;
             }

-            if (_inventory.TryGetSlotEntity(performer, "mask", out var maskSelf)
-                && TryComp<IngestionBlockerComponent>(maskSelf, out var blockerPerformer)
-                && blockerPerformer.Enabled)
+            if (_inventory.TryGetSlotEntity(performer, "mask", out var maskSelf) && IsMaskBlocking(maskSelf))
             {
                 _popupSystem.PopupPredicted(Loc.GetString("cpr-must-remove-own-mask", ("clothing", maskSelf)), performer, performer, PopupType.MediumCaution);
                 return;
             }

Resources/Prototypes/DeltaV/Entities/Objects/Weapons/Guns/Battery/battery_guns.yml (1)

Line range hint 150-154: Consider adding visual distinctions for security variants

While the security variants are properly implemented with clear descriptions, consider adding visual distinctions (e.g., different sprites or colors) to help players easily identify security-issued weapons.

Also applies to: 240-244

Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Weapons/Throwable/grenades.yml (1)

406-406: LGTM! Consider improving the edit comment.

The increase in SpaceCleaner quantity from 30 to 50 aligns well with the PR objective and maintains consistency with similar grenade types. However, the comment "# WD EDIT" could be more descriptive.

Consider replacing the comment with something more descriptive like:

-        Quantity: 50 # WD EDIT
+        Quantity: 50 # Increased from 30 to match cleaning requirements for full tile coverage

Resources/Changelog/Changelog.yml (3)

Line range hint 1-8544: Changelog entries should follow consistent formatting

The changelog contains a mix of formatting styles and languages. Consider standardizing:

1. All entries should have a URL field
2. Message formatting should be consistent (some use markdown, others plain text)
3. Bilingual entries should separate languages with a forward slash consistently
4. Type field values should be standardized to: Add, Remove, Fix, Tweak

Consider adding validation to enforce consistent formatting:

Entries:
  - author: string # Required
    changes:
      - message: string # Required, use consistent formatting
        type: enum[Add|Remove|Fix|Tweak] # Required, standardized types
    id: integer # Required
    time: datetime # Required ISO8601
    url: url # Required, valid URL

---

8477-8478: Avoid generic changelog messages

The message "Upstream :D" is not descriptive enough to be useful. Changelog entries should clearly describe what changed.

Consider replacing with a more descriptive message that explains what upstream changes were integrated.

---

Line range hint 8484-8485: Use specific descriptions for bug fixes

The message "Массовый баг фикс" (Mass bug fix) is too vague. Bug fix entries should describe what specific issues were fixed.

Consider listing the key bugs that were fixed to help users understand the impact.

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of the `Mop` method that may need updating.

# Search for method calls to `Mop` that do not match the new signature
rg --glob '!AbsorbentSystem.cs' -t cs -A 2 'Mop\('

#!/bin/bash
# Use ast-grep to find method invocations of Mop
ast-grep --pattern 'Mop($$$)'

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any client-side systems that reference this component

# Search for client-side systems using this component
echo "Checking Client-side usage:"
rg -l "IngestionBlockerComponent" Content.Client/

# Search for shared systems using this component
echo -e "\nChecking Shared systems usage:"
rg -l "IngestionBlockerComponent" Content.Shared/

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details of systems using this component
echo "=== Shared IngestionBlockerSystem implementation ==="
rg "class IngestionBlockerSystem" -A 10 Content.Shared/Nutrition/EntitySystems/IngestionBlockerSystem.cs

echo -e "\n=== CPRSystem usage ==="
rg "IngestionBlocker" -A 5 Content.Shared/Medical/CPR/Systems/CPRSystem.cs

# Check if there are any server-side systems still using this
echo -e "\n=== Server-side usage ==="
rg -l "IngestionBlockerComponent" Content.Server/

#!/bin/bash
# Check how server systems use this component
echo "=== FoodSystem usage ==="
rg "IngestionBlocker" -A 5 Content.Server/Nutrition/EntitySystems/FoodSystem.cs

echo -e "\n=== BloodSuckerSystem usage ==="
rg "IngestionBlocker" -A 5 Content.Server/Vampire/BloodSuckerSystem.cs

echo -e "\n=== FelinidSystem usage ==="
rg "IngestionBlocker" -A 5 Content.Server/Nyanotrasen/Abilities/Felinid/FelinidSystem.cs

-    [Obsolete] public override bool DeferredClose => false;
+    [Obsolete("DeferredClose is no longer used for storage UI. Use StorageSystem.CloseStorageWindow instead.")] 
+    public override bool DeferredClose => false;

-    [Obsolete] public override bool DeferredClose => false;
+    [Obsolete("DeferredClose is no longer used for storage UI. Use StorageSystem.CloseStorageWindow instead.")] 
+    public override bool DeferredClose => false;

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for references to DeferredClose to understand its usage
# and potential impact of hardcoding to false

# Search for any references to DeferredClose in the codebase
echo "Searching for DeferredClose references:"
rg "DeferredClose" -A 3

# Search for the base class to understand the original behavior
echo -e "\nSearching for the base class definition:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  DeferredClose
  $$$
}'

#!/bin/bash
# Search for StorageSystem.CloseStorageWindow to verify the suggested alternative
echo "Searching for StorageSystem.CloseStorageWindow:"
rg "CloseStorageWindow" -A 3

# Search for BoundUserInterface class to understand the base implementation
echo -e "\nSearching for BoundUserInterface class:"
fd "BoundUserInterface.cs" --exec rg -A 5 "class BoundUserInterface"

# Search for any recent changes or removals related to DeferredClose
echo -e "\nSearching for any recent changes mentioning DeferredClose:"
git log -p --grep="DeferredClose" --max-count=2

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any class that has DeferredClose property
echo "Searching for classes with DeferredClose property:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  public $_ bool DeferredClose
  $$$
}'

# Search for any interface definitions that might declare DeferredClose
echo -e "\nSearching for interface with DeferredClose:"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
  $$$
  bool DeferredClose
  $$$
}'

# Search for files containing "BoundUserInterface" to find the base class
echo -e "\nSearching for BoundUserInterface references:"
rg "class.*BoundUserInterface" -A 3

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of SizeRatio to verify consistency
rg -A 2 "SizeRatio.*=|get;|set;" --type cs

#!/bin/bash
# Search for SizeRatio field definitions and usages
rg -A 2 "SizeRatio.*[=;]" --type cs

#!/bin/bash
# Search for footprint-related implementation
rg -A 10 "AddColor.*tripper" --type cs

 if (1 - (setupWidth / actualWidth) < 0.15)
+    Logger.Debug($"LobbyGui: Showing right side panel. Setup width: {setupWidth}, Screen width: {actualWidth}, Ratio: {1 - (setupWidth / actualWidth)}");
     RightSide.Visible = true;

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar damage values in other tools for comparison
rg -A 5 'damage:\s*\n\s*types:' | rg -B 1 -A 3 'Blunt|Slash'

#!/bin/bash
# Search for damage configurations in tools and similar items
rg -U --multiline 'damage:[\s\n]+types:' -A 5

#!/bin/bash
# Search for damage values in tools and similar items, focusing on Blunt and Slash damage types
rg -U --multiline '(Blunt|Slash):\s*\d+(\.\d+)?' Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Tools/ Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Specific/Hydroponics/

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of damage types to verify consistency
rg -A 1 'damage:\s*\n\s*types:' | rg -A 1 'Piercing|Pierce'

#!/bin/bash
# Search for damage type definitions and usage patterns
rg -U "Piercing|Pierce" --type yaml

# Also try searching with ast-grep to find any damage type definitions in code
ast-grep --pattern 'enum DamageType {
  $$$
}'

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other entities using these collision layers to understand potential interactions
rg -l "Impassable|MidImpassable|LowImpassable" Resources/Prototypes/Entities/

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of these layers in some key files to understand the collision patterns
rg -A 5 "Impassable|MidImpassable|LowImpassable" Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Misc/ice_crust.yml Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Materials/shards.yml Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Specific/Janitorial/janitor.yml

# Also check the base structure definitions for these layers
rg -A 5 "Impassable|MidImpassable|LowImpassable" Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Structures/base_structure.yml

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of LayingDownComponent to ensure complete migration
ast-grep --pattern 'LayingDownComponent'

# Search for other standing state checks to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern $'_standingState.IsDown($_)'

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the StandingStateSystem implementation to understand IsDown
ast-grep --pattern $'class StandingStateSystem {
  $$$
}'

# Also search for any references to standing state transitions
rg "StandingState\." -A 3

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other potential audio-related crash scenarios in the codebase

# Look for similar patterns where AudioComponent might be used without checks
ast-grep --pattern 'TryComp<AudioComponent>($_, out $_)'

# Look for direct audio stream usage without null checks
rg 'weather\.Stream' -A 2

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other emergency shuttle related configurations
# that might need to be adjusted for consistency

rg -A 2 "EmergencyShuttle|emergency.*shuttle|shuttle.*emergency"

Content.Server/Fluids/EntitySystems/AbsorbentSystem.cs (1)

299-331: Consider extracting puddle processing logic.

The puddle processing loop is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider extracting it into a separate method for better maintainability.

-foreach (var (entity, component) in targets)
-{
-    if (!_solutionContainerSystem.ResolveSolution(entity, component.SolutionName, ref component.Solution, out var puddleSolution) || puddleSolution.Volume <= 0)
-        continue;
-    // ... rest of the processing logic
-}
+private bool ProcessPuddle(
+    EntityUid entity,
+    PuddleComponent component,
+    EntityUid user,
+    EntityUid used,
+    Entity<SolutionComponent> absorberSoln,
+    AbsorbentComponent absorber,
+    TileRef tileRef)
+{
+    if (!_solutionContainerSystem.ResolveSolution(entity, component.SolutionName, ref component.Solution, out var puddleSolution) || puddleSolution.Volume <= 0)
+        return false;
+    // ... rest of the processing logic
+    return true;
+}

+foreach (var (entity, component) in targets)
+{
+    playSound |= ProcessPuddle(entity, component, user, used, absorberSoln, absorber, tileRef);
+}

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Learnt from: Spatison
PR: WWhiteDreamProject/wwdpublic#131
File: Content.Server/Fluids/EntitySystems/AbsorbentSystem.cs:102-103
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T23:58:34.392Z
Learning: In the C# file `Content.Server/Fluids/EntitySystems/AbsorbentSystem.cs` within the Robust framework, in the `OnInteractNoHand` method of the `AbsorbentSystem` class, it's appropriate to use `uid` for both `user` and `used` parameters in `Mop()` since the object uses itself.

Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Weapons/Melee/pickaxe.yml (2)

Heavy attack parameters are inconsistent with other melee weapons

The heavy attack modifiers for the pickaxe significantly deviate from the established pattern in other melee weapons:

• Other weapons typically have heavyDamageBaseModifier ≥ 1.0 (20% more damage), while pickaxe has 0.5 (50% less damage)
• Most weapons have heavyStaminaCost between 5-20, while pickaxe has 0
• The heavyRateModifier of 0.8 is within normal range (0.5-0.9)

This makes heavy attacks strictly inferior to normal attacks for the pickaxe, contrary to the game's design where heavy attacks trade stamina and speed for increased damage.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 28-31: Review heavy attack parameters for game balance

The new heavy attack modifiers seem counterintuitive from a gameplay perspective:

• Heavy attacks are 20% slower but deal 50% less damage
• No stamina cost removes the trade-off mechanism for heavy attacks

This might make heavy attacks strictly worse than normal attacks, potentially making the feature redundant.

Let's check if this is consistent with other melee weapons:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for heavy attack parameters in other melee weapons
rg "heavyDamageBaseModifier|heavyRateModifier|heavyStaminaCost" "Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Weapons/Melee/"

Length of output: 3337

---

Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response. The changes to the pickaxe and mining drill appear to be combat-related adjustments without any corresponding bug reports or mining-related issues in the codebase. The modifications focus on combat mechanics (heavyStaminaCost, heavyDamageBaseModifier, etc.) while maintaining the same structural damage values that affect mining functionality.

Combat balance changes need justification

These modifications appear to be combat balance adjustments rather than bug fixes:

• Added heavy attack modifiers to pickaxe
• Modified mining drill's combat stats
• No changes to mining-related damage values (Structural damage)

The changes should either:

1. Be moved to a separate balance-focused PR
2. Include documentation of the specific bugs these combat changes are addressing

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-74: Verify alignment with PR objectives

These changes appear to be balance adjustments rather than bug fixes. The PR description doesn't mention any combat-related issues or mining tool balance changes that these modifications would address.

Please clarify:

1. What bugs are these changes fixing?
2. Were there reported issues with mining tool combat mechanics?
3. Has this been tested for mining functionality impact?

Let's check for related bug reports or discussions:

---

Note: If the GitHub CLI commands fail (as they might in the sandbox), let's try a different approach:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related bug reports or discussions in recent commits
git log --grep="mining\|pickaxe\|drill" --since="1 month ago" --pretty=format:"%h %s"

Length of output: 0

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for related bug reports or discussions in issue comments and PR descriptions
gh issue list --search "mining drill pickaxe combat" --state all --limit 50 --json title,body,state

# Also search for recent changes to these files
git log -p -- "Resources/Prototypes/Entities/Objects/Weapons/Melee/pickaxe.yml" --since="3 months ago"

# Let's also check for related configuration files that might define combat mechanics
fd "\.yml$" | grep -i "combat\|weapon\|mining"

Length of output: 12564

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related combat/mining configuration patterns in the codebase
rg -l "MeleeWeapon|heavyStaminaCost|heavyDamageBaseModifier" --type yaml

# Look for other mining tools to compare configurations
rg "parent: BaseItem.*Pickaxe|MiningDrill" --type yaml -A 5

Length of output: 13095

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL